
Oct 15, 2010
Transcript
JAD ABUMRAD: Hey, I'm Jad Abumrad.
ROBERT KRULWICH: I'm Robert Krulwich.
JAD: This is Radiolab. Today ...
ROBERT: Subject is ...
JAD: Fate.
ROBERT: So if you think there is such a thing as fate ...
JAD: Fate.
ROBERT: And—and you want some hint of what is the plan for you, what's in store for you or for someone you love.
JAD: What is predestined, right?
ROBERT: Yes. Then, well, as we know, our—our professor at Columbia, Walter Mischel, he would simply offer you a marshmallow.
JAD: Yeah.
ROBERT: Malcolm would ask you what your birthday is.
JAD: You know, but there's another way to do this.
ROBERT: What?
JAD: Just look at what a person writes—their emails, their essays, whatever. What if you were to take that text ...
IAN LANCASHIRE: Hello.
JAD: Give it to this guy. He puts it into a computer and you turn it into ...
IAN LANCASHIRE: Data.
ROBERT: What do you mean? Who—who is that?
JAD: This is ...
IAN LANCASHIRE: My name is Ian Lancashire. I'm a professor of English at the University of Toronto.
JAD: Now Ian, as he said, is an English professor, but he's also a computer guy.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Right. Founded a computing center with the help of IBM Canada.
JAD: And the reason he combines those two, is because he's interested in the secrets behind the author's words.
ROBERT: Hmm.
JAD: And that desire, he says, to take a text, spin it into data as a way to get into that author's head? Well, that goes back a long way.
IAN LANCASHIRE: It goes back to the fathers of the Christian Church.
JAD: To the Bible.
IAN LANCASHIRE: In the early Middle Ages.
JAD: So monks decided to make what's called a concordance of the Bible. And what that means is they were gonna take every single word in the Bible, and there are 960,243 of them, at least in the King James version, and they were gonna list them all alphabetically, notate each time every single word was used and the context.
ROBERT: Ay yi yi.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Yes. Imagine it. You begin with the first verse.
JAD: "In the beginning ..."
IAN LANCASHIRE: [laughs] You create a heading for the first word.
JAD: "In." All right.
IAN LANCASHIRE: And then for the second word.
JAD: "The."
IAN LANCASHIRE: And then for the third.
JAD: "Beginning."
IAN LANCASHIRE: Every time you come across those words, you have to write a context.
JAD: "In Genesis one, verse one, occurrence one. "In the beginning", Genesis one, verse six, occurrence two. "And God said, 'Let there be a firmament in the midst ...'"
IAN LANCASHIRE: It's all handwritten. And at the end, you end—well, you end up with a lot of pieces of paper.
JAD: So many that it took those first monks, you know, who decided to do this, an entire lifetime to complete it. Nowadays, you know, with computers you can be done in.
IAN LANCASHIRE: In under 15 seconds.
JAD: Bam! So that all just basically sets the stage for the story that I'm about to tell you. It's the 1980s, Ian is an English professor at Toronto. He's got a lab full of computers and he's using them to analyze his favorite authors.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Samuel Taylor Coleridge, TS Elliot, James Joyce, Cadman, Chaucer, Shakespeare.
JAD: And he's turning up some interesting stuff, sort of.
IAN LANCASHIRE: For example, in his poetry, Milton, didn't use the word "because." Who knows why?
JAD: Yeah. But at a certain point, Ian decided to look at more modern authors.
IAN LANCASHIRE: And so I turned to Agatha Christie.
JAD: At the time he was doing this—we're now in the '90s—Agatha Christie happened to be the most published author ever.
IAN LANCASHIRE: She sold a billion books.
JAD: A billion? Like "B" billion?
IAN LANCASHIRE: She was number one.
JAD: Behind God.
IAN LANCASHIRE: After—after the Bible, I think. [laughs] So what I did is I collected two of her earliest novels written in the early '20s.
JAD: He fed those two into the computer.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Then I did the third.
JAD: Eventually, he would add in 14 additional books that cover 50 years of Agatha Christie's writing.
JAD: What is the computer doing exactly?
IAN LANCASHIRE: Measuring the individual concordance, word frequency, vocabulary of the works.
JAD: And all the while it's spitting out these reports.
IAN LANCASHIRE: And I saw the totals at the bottom. So all this ...
JAD: Now first of all, the woman wrote 80 detective novels, which is just amazing in and of itself. The computer found that her use of language was relatively consistent and normal for the first 72 of those books. But something happened on book number 73, something drastic.
ROBERT: What?
JAD: Suddenly her use of words like ...
IAN LANCASHIRE: Words like "thing," "anything," "something," "nothing."
JAD: ... what Ian calls indefinite words ...
IAN LANCASHIRE: These—these words increased six times.
JAD: But also, when the computer added up the vocabulary size of that book ...
IAN LANCASHIRE: That is how many different words are there in the first 50,000 words of a text.
JAD: ... it found in this book, there were 20 percent fewer different words.
IAN LANCASHIRE: That is astounding. That's one fifth of her vocabulary lost.
JAD: It gradually dawned on him that what he might be seeing was the very beginning stages of an author losing herself.
IAN LANCASHIRE: She had developed Alzheimer's. I delayed publishing my results for two years. I had to have the results analyzed by a computational linguist and a statistician.
JAD: And in her lifetime, was she ever actually diagnosed?
IAN LANCASHIRE: Absolutely not. There was no diagnosis.
JAD: He said that some of her biographers suspected that something was up in her later years.
IAN LANCASHIRE: One point apparently she cut off all her hair. She was not doing very well in interviews.
JAD: But as far as we know, she was never taken to a doctor, never got diagnosed.
IAN LANCASHIRE: I think her family closed around her and protected her. I realized that I was seeing something about the human mind. I was seeing the author in the text in a way that people hadn't seen the author in the text before.
JAD: Which raised a question for me—and I think this can apply to anyone. I mean, we all write a bazillion emails a day. I've got a decade's worth on my computer. Does that stuff hold clues about what will be? Like early warning signs?
IAN LANCASHIRE: I think it's possible it does. Yes. And it's well worth doing research about how a loss of vocabulary can be determined, let’s say, in one's email over five or six years.
JAD: Indications are, he says, that those clues are there. Not only that, they may actually be there practically from the beginning.
KELVIN LIM: Oh, yep. Yep.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Very famous example is the so-called nuns study.
KELVIN LIM: Okay. The—the nuns study actually began in 1990.
JAD: This is Dr. Kelvin Lim. He works at the University of Minnesota, and is the current director of the so-called nuns study. And this study, more than any other that we know, really makes the point about the predictive power of the words we choose. Study began with a guy named David Snowden who wanted to look at aging over time. So he chose nuns because he wanted a group that was healthy.
KELVIN LIM: For example, they don't smoke. They don't drink.
JAD: They all have similar lifestyles.
KELVIN LIM: They obviously haven't had children.
JAD: So he approached this one particular order in Connecticut.
KELVIN LIM: Called the School Sisters of Notre Dame.
JAD: And he signed up just short of 700 nuns. And the only stipulation being ...
KELVIN LIM: You had to be at least 75 years of age. And so we're now 20 years in the study, so that means the youngest of the sisters is about 95.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Yeah, I think I am. I am the youngest.
JAD: And you are 94 years old.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Yes, sir.
JAD: Not 95.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Not 95. [laughs]
JAD: This is Sister Alberta Sheridan.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: I like the way you said that.
JAD: Do you happen to know who the oldest remaining sister in the study is?
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Wait a minute. Now the one who was buried today, Jad, was 101. I think she was the oldest one in the study.
JAD: Wow!
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: In our province, yes.
JAD: The study began innocently enough, she says. The researchers would show up to the convent every year, give the nuns a bunch of tests.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: But, like, mostly from memory. Just questioning back and forth.
JAD: And then over the years, as the nuns passed away, which many of them have at this point ...
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: They've all gone, Jad.
JAD: Of the original 678 sisters ...
KELVIN LIM: At this point, we have approximately 40 sisters still alive and participating in the study.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: And I'm the only one left here in the Wilton province.
JAD: And as the nuns would pass away, the researchers had arranged it so that they would get a small piece of their brains.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Yes.
JAD: Which they could examine for plaques and tangles.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Now this morning, we buried a sister here, I told you. But the funeral was delayed a bit because she had to be taken to the hospital to have a portion of her brain removed to further the study.
JAD: Wow.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Mm-hmm.
JAD: Okay, so here's why I bring this study up, because of an accident that happened pretty early on, that changed everything in the study. David Snowden, the main dude was in the convent archives, and he was talking to the archivist. The archivist says to him, "Hey, you know all these nuns that you're studying, who right now are over the age of 75? I actually have the essays that they wrote right when they got here."
KELVIN LIM: And they did this roughly at about age 18.
JAD: Like 60 years before?
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Oh, yes. Oh, yeah.
KELVIN LIM: Right.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: I have a copy of it at home. [laughs] Oh, that's great. Come on in, Naomi.
NAOMI STAROBIN: Thank you so much.
JAD: We actually asked a reporter, Naomi Starobin, to visit Sister Alberta at her home in Connecticut.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: Are you late today?
JAD: And have her read her essay that is now 76 years old.
NAOMI STAROBIN: Yeah, go ahead.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: "Two days after the birth of the Christ child, I was brought as a belated Christmas gift to a Mr. and Mrs. Albert Joseph Sheridan of Providence, Rhode Island. A week later, the sparkling waters of baptism were poured over me." I'm not gonna read all this silly stuff that—when I first entered.
NAOMI STAROBIN: Why not?
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: It sounds kinda saccharine. I was only a teenager when I wrote ...
JAD: But here's the thing: when the researchers found the essays, like the one you just heard, it was a gold mine.
SERGUEI PAKHOMOV: It was a major, major find.
JAD: So they analyzed the essays, looking primarily at ...
SERGUEI PAKHOMOV: Two specific features of the language that was contained in these narratives.
JAD: That's Serguei Pakhomov. He does the analysis for the current nun study.
SERGUEI PAKHOMOV: In particular, they looked at the notion of grammatical complexity and idea density.
JAD: What is idea density? What does that mean?
SERGUEI PAKHOMOV: Idea density is a measure that looks at how many basic units of meaning are contained in any given utterance, divided by the total number of words in that utterance.
JAD: In other words ...
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: "The date of my birth is December 27th."
JAD: ... like, if you were to listen to sister Alberta's autobiography ...
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: "When I was 11 years of age, my dear mother was called to God."
JAD: ... it's the number of little discreet ideas she's able to cram into one sentence.
SISTER ALBERTA SHERIDAN: "This was to be a turning point in my life, as I had always had the odd desire to become a sister."
JAD: Here's a classic example of the difference between low and high idea density. Here's low.
SERGUEI PAKHOMOV: From Sister Helen. "I was born in Eau Claire, Wisconsin on May 24, 1913, and was baptized in Saint James Church."
JAD: Okay, that's low. Now here's high.
SERGUEI PAKHOMOV: From Sister Emma. "It was about a half hour before midnight between February 28 and 29 of the leap year 1912 when I began to live and to die as the third child of my mother, whose maiden name is Hilda Hoffman, and my father Otto Schmidt."
JAD: I gotta say, I'm liking the first one.
KELVIN LIM: Jad, probably you as a journalist, seeing the first one as straight to the point.
JAD: Yeah, it's good writing.
KELVIN LIM: And the second one seems kind of embellished.
JAD: A little bit. Yeah.
JAD: But here's the punchline of all this. Turns out that the people who, when they were 18 wrote in that journalistically, very precise, low idea density sort of way, those people, 60 years later were vastly, vastly more likely to develop dementia. In fact, based on those essays alone, the researchers could predict with about 85 percent accuracy, what the nun's brains would look like when they died and were able to look at the brains. I mean, would the brains have plaques and tangles that you associate with Alzheimer's or would they not?
ROBERT: [sighs]
JAD: What?
ROBERT: I mean? That's just crazy.
JAD: Wait, why?
ROBERT: It's backwards reasoning. Well, we'll see. We'll see. I'm just—suddenly, I'm suspicious.
JAD: Why?
ROBERT: Here's a man who, from what you just said, has found the ones who got sick and working backwards, found certain incidences of this, that or the other, and says, "Ah, this is a cause that produces this effect."
JAD: No, no, no, no. There's no cause and effect here.
KELVIN LIM: These studies are—are demonstrating associations, right? They're not demonstrating causality.
JAD: Right.
KELVIN LIM: There's a very important distinction.
JAD: This is just a correlation. Okay?
ROBERT: But, you know, that may be one of 190 correlations that produce people who get Alzheimer's in the end.
JAD: Yeah. I mean, yeah. I mean, but let me argue your case actually from a different angle. Like, would this kind of linguistic analysis actually be relevant in the age of Twitter where everything is short and clipped?
ROBERT: But people who Twitter, don't only Twitter. They might also write, small, short, dense essays for their...
JAD: Yeah. But well, you know, I mean, I guess you're right. It's like, it's mostly about the thoughts in your head, not so much what you write.
ROBERT: Well, so what about Agatha Christie? Was there a conclusion about Agatha?
JAD: Yeah, there was.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Agatha Christie writing "Elephants Can Remember."
JAD: This brings us back to Ian Lancashire and that 73rd book of Agatha Christie’s that he analyzed, and found that her vocabulary dipped. Well, before he did the analysis, he picked up that book and gave it a read and like most people who read it, didn't like it.
IAN LANCASHIRE: Initially, I thought it was very poorly written, badly plotted, full of errors of time, of dating. Terrible read. Then I realized when I looked at the title, "Elephants Can Remember ..."
JAD: He realized that maybe Agatha Christie sensed what was happening to her.
IAN LANCASHIRE: She was responding to that truism that elephants never forget. The—the chief character is an aging female novelist named Ariadne, who is a foil for Agatha herself. And she, Ariadne, is suffering from memory loss.
JAD: In the story, she tries to help a detective solve this crime, but she has trouble because she keeps forgetting.
IAN LANCASHIRE: And the last—the last sentence in that novel in fact is Agatha saying, "Well, maybe it's okay not to remember."
JAD: Wow!
IAN LANCASHIRE: She was trying to defend herself, defend her sense that she was forgetting, she was losing her vocabulary, she was losing her language. I began to see that Christie was heroic, still writing despite this handicap.
JAD: Yeah.
IAN LANCASHIRE: And her willingness to do that at an age of 81, 82, struck me as—as heroic in a way.
ROBERT: Well, I understand that. That's—the muse wouldn't quit, but the—the tools all left the room.
JAD: Yeah.
ROBERT: So thinking about Agatha Christie and the nuns, and then earlier in the marshmallows, and basically to pull this show home to a nice, happy knot, there are two ways to think about destiny. First, you can think, "Well, I have one."
JAD: Yeah.
ROBERT: There's some kind of pattern in my life. Some sort of ...
JAD: All you have to do is look at the clues and I can maybe know what it is.
ROBERT: Or the other view is: who knows? Que sera, sera. What will be, will be. Like, stuff happens.
PAUL AUSTER: Anything can happen at any time.
ROBERT: That's Paul Auster. Remember him from the beginning of the show?
JAD: Yeah.
ROBERT: And he's—curiously, in this show, he's the guy who says there's no pattern, no way, no how.
PAUL AUSTER: You're on your way to your wedding and you die in a car crash. I mean, these things happen. So listen, talking about the true stories that I've written, I mean, the—the really crucial one is the thing that happened to me when I was 14 years old, when I was out hiking with a bunch of camp kids in the summer of 1961, and we got caught in a lightning storm. And we were going into a clearing, but in order to get to the clearing, we had to crawl under a barbed wire fence. The lightning and thunder are crashing all around us, and the boy right next to me was struck by lightning and killed. And he was as far away from me as you are from me right now.
ROBERT: Really.
PAUL AUSTER: We were right next to each other. Let me just—I might as well. Okay. "I don't remember saying anything. I don't remember crying. Another boy and I kept ourselves busy trying to take care of Ralph—the name of the boy. He was still unconscious. We rubbed his hands and arms. We held down his tongue, so he wouldn't swallow it. We told him to hang in there. After a while his skin began to take on a bluish tinge. His body seemed colder to my touch, but in spite of the mounting evidence, it never once occurred to me that he wasn't going to come around. I was only 14 years old after all. And what did I know? I'd never seen a dead person before.
PAUL AUSTER: "Later on when they told me he was dead, I learned that there was an eight inch burn across his back. I remember trying to absorb this news and telling myself that life would never feel the same to me again. Strangely enough, I didn't think about how I had been right next to him when it happened. I didn't think, 'One or two seconds later. And it would've been me.' What I thought about was holding his tongue and looking down at his teeth. His mouth had been set in a slight grimace. And with his lips partly open, I had spent an hour looking down at the tips of his teeth. 34 years later, I still remember them. His half closed, half open eyes. I remember those too."
PAUL AUSTER: And I can't tell you how this jolted me. It absolutely formed, I think, my whole view of life. The thing that I said before, anything can happen at any moment. When you think about how many people there are in the world, how many things there are, how many, cars in motion, how many buses moving, planes flying, well sure, things are gonna intersect in different ways. And we can't predict how.
ROBERT: So that's what we're examining. And I thought, well, maybe you would agree that there is some kind of string through the world, which if you know how to push it will tell ...
PAUL AUSTER: You, see, I really believe firmly that stories can only be told backward. You can't—you can't predict.
ROBERT: So the notion which we are—we are suggesting in the other stories is that you begin your life, you walk into the world, you write down an essay, you don't or do eat a cupcake. And these people in the white coats look at your essay and look at your cupcake reaction and they go, "Hmm ..."
PAUL AUSTER: Well ...
ROBERT: And they say things about you going forward, way forward in time.
PAUL AUSTER: I don't know. These seem like random variables to me. There are about 10,000 other things that probably factor in. So too many ...
ROBERT: You'd make a terrible social scientist.
PAUL AUSTER: Yeah, I know. Well, I remember Charles Olson, the great American poet, he called sociology a withered grape. And I—I think I tend to agree with it. [laughs]
ROBERT: [laughs]
ROBERT: I guess he got us right. "Radiolab, making wine out of withered grapes." [laughs]
JAD: [laughs] that should be our tagline.
ROBERT: Paul Auster's most recent book is called ...
JAD: Invisible.
ROBERT: Yeah, that's right. It's very hard to find. And the story we just heard comes from his book "The Invention of Solitude."
JAD: That's right. And we gotta go, but there—we're always online at Radiolab.org. Subscribe to our podcast there.
ROBERT: Thank you for listening.
JAD: Yes! I'm Jad Abumrad.
ROBERT: I'm Robert Krulwich.
JAD: Bye.
[LISTENER: Radiolab is produced by Jad Abumrad and Soren Wheeler. Our staff includes Ellen Horne, Pat Walters, Tim Howard, Lynn Levy, Lulu Miller and Brenna Farrell. With help from Raymond Tendulkar, Sam Roudman and Nicole Corey. Special thanks to Katie Sol. Talk to you later. Bye.]
-30-
Copyright © 2024 New York Public Radio. All rights reserved. Visit our website terms of use at www.wnyc.org for further information.
New York Public Radio transcripts are created on a rush deadline, often by contractors. This text may not be in its final form and may be updated or revised in the future. Accuracy and availability may vary. The authoritative record of programming is the audio record.